Scenario Ratings

Hot War Home
What's New
Resources
Scenarios
PBEM Opponents
NetPlay Opponents
Scenario Ratings
HW Links
Other Links
Library
Guest Book

CSRC Home
East Front Home
West Front Home
Rising Sun Home
Hot War Home
Designers Guild

Player's Scenario Ratings*

Submission Form

Scenario Title	Date	Axis	Allied	Complexity Rating	Turns	Modified Complexity	Balance	Enjoyment Rating	# of Votes
Mobile Defense at Northeim	Jan-45	USSR	US/FRG	6	24	7.2	-	-	-
Shoulder to Shoulder	Jan-45	USSR	US/FRG	10	30	15.0	-	-	-
Airborne Carpet	Jan-45	USSR	Brit	8	30	12.0	-	-	-
A Lesson from Napoleon	Feb-45	USSR	Brit	6	30	9.0	-	-	-
Onslaught	Mar-45	USSR	US/FRG	7	18	6.3	-	-	-
Travels on the Silk Road	Mar-45	USSR	Brit/Fra	3	24	3.6	-	-	-

Modified Complexity: This rating takes into account both complexity and length; the higher the number, the more complex. 10 represents a 10 complexity, 20 turn scenario.

Balance rating: 5 = Very Pro Axis (USSR), 3 = Neutral, 1 = Very Pro Allies

Enjoyment Rating: 10 = Great, 0 = Horrible

Player Ratings shown as median of votes.

Bold indicates the side 'best played' by the player. If both are bold, this is suggested to be a two player scenario.

Home

Please give me your input on each scenario you've played?

Which Scenario?

How is this scenario's balance?

How was the overall enjoyment/challenge of this scenario?

A few requests:

1) If you make an error in submitting a vote, please email me and let me know what it was supposed to be. I'll fix it.

2) One vote per customer per scenario, please.

3) If you wondering if you should vote, please do. The more data, the more accurate the results!

4) PLEASE, only vote if you played the scenario as suggested (i.e. "Best played as..."). These scenarios are specifically designed to be played one way. Fun, challenge and balance could be seriously effected by other choices. The results above are intended to reflect what people should expect if they play the scenario as recommended.

Home